|
Did
the employer provide forewarning?
-
Was the employee
given forewarning or foreknowledge of the possible or probable disciplinary
consequences of their conduct? The warning may be given orally or in printed
form. An exception may be made for certain conduct (I.e., insubordination,
coming to work chemically impared, drinking on the job, or stealing company
property).
Was it a reasonable
rule?
-
Was the employer’s
rule or managerial order reasonably related to (a) the orderly, efficient, and
safe operation of the company’s business, and (b) the performance that the
employer might properly expect of the employee?
Did the employer
investigate?
-
Did
the employer, before administering guidance to an employee, make an effort
to discover whether the employee did, in fact, violate or disobey a rule or
order of management? The investigation normally should be made before the
decision to discipline is made. However, there are immediate action is
required, the best course of action is to suspend the employee pending
investigation with the understanding that the worker will be reinstated and
paid for lost time if there is no basis for punishment.
Was the
investigation fair?
Did the “judge”
find proof?
-
At the
investigation, did the “judge” obtain substantial evidence or proof that the
employee was guilty as charged? It is not required that the evidence be
conclusive or “beyond a reasonable doubt,” except where the alleged
misconduct is of such criminal or reprehensible nature as to stigmatize the
employee and seriously impair their chances for future employment.
Are all employees
being treated fairly?
-
Has the company
applied its rules, orders, and penalties evenhandedly and without discrimination
to all employees? If enforcement has been lax in the past, management can’t
suddenly reverse its course and begin cracking down without first warning
employees of its intent.
Is the penalty
appropriate?
-
Was
the degree of discipline administered by the company reasonably related to (a)
the seriousness of the employee’s proven offense, and (b) the record of the
employee in his/her service with the company? If the employee A’s past record
is significantly better than Employee B’s, the company may
properly punish Employee A more lightly than Employee B for the same offense.
|
Without
a union, employees are “at will” employees, meaning they can be fired
without just cause. Working under a union contract changes that, giving people
workplace rights. But what, exactly, is just cause? Answering “No” to any of
these questions normally means the employer does not have just and proper
cause.
|